You’ve been lied to since childhood

The hardest thing that anyone has to accept when breaking free of the Matrix of modern soceity is that they’ve been lied to since childhood.

Everything that they’ve been taught that is “bad” for a man to do (be a jerk, date/sleep with multiple women, make her jealous, look out for our own interests first, listen to our thoughts and opinions and ignore hers when she stops her little feet, etc) is actually the right thing to do if you want lots of sex or even a happy and successful relationship.

I’ve seen with my own two eyes that when you bark orders at a woman, treat her like she’s easily replacable, laugh at her demands, and otherwise treat her like garbage then she’ll happily lick your feet clean and ask for seconds.

Yet if you take that same woman and then start being nice, calling all the time, telling her you love her all the time, take her to dinner every night, etc (basically doing all the AFC things that you’ve been taught by “soceity” (TV and movies) to do since you were a kid) you’ll quickly find that those feelings of “infinite unending love” and “we’re soulmates meant to be together for life” will disappear faster then you can say “what the hell just happened” and she’ll have a heart of Ice towards you. Its extremely counter-intuitive…. the fact that the social reinforcement flows almost completely in the AFC direction makes it even harder to identify these facts- let alone change your behavior.


Hot is all that matters

Men are judged by the hotness and quantity of the women they bang- not the moral character of said women.

Men would rather bang a scandalous lying slut who’s a 10 then a 2 with a heart of gold. And really- that says it all. All these morality crusaders are critical of women and their “moral flaws” and admonish men who use them for what they’re good for- but yet they have NO problem nexting girls strickly on appearence, the superficial- judging the book by its cover. Its pure hypocracy and self deceit.

Beauty is the primary value. Find it and exploit it- its rare enough as it is.
If the secondary values disqualify from LTR fine- but don’t pretend that they carry enough weight that they actually affect the primary value that a woman is judged on.

Be the master, not the dog

Nice guys try to please women because their happiness is dependent on women. Their attempts to please women they are really attempts to make themselves happy- women are the judges and distrubtors of happiness for them.

They’re dogs who wag their tails and are thrilled to here the cooing of a woman’s voice telling them what a “Good boy” they are for doing as they were commanded.
It is impossible to please a woman. Fulfill a demand and it is only a matter of time until she appoints you another task to fulfill. With a woman’s happiness you are sysiphyus endlessly pushing the boulder up the hill. Eternally struggling yet getting nowhere. Worse yet, fulfilling those demands are, in and of themselves, the hallmark of beta behavior and will dry her panties and drive her away.

The smart man knows that he is far better off determining the criteria of his own happiness then letting a woman be the arbiter who dictates the terms of it.

Nice Guy = Slave Morality
Smart Guy = Master Morality

Never work to please a woman. She should be thrilled to be around someone as wonderful as you. If she tries to “change’ (control) you- tell her to stop trying to control you (they hate it when you call a spade a spade- it kills their little game).

 If she persists tell her that if she dosen’t like it she’s free to leave at any time.

Why nascent alphas need to date multiple women

The point of dating multiple women, for the guys who are not yet true alphas, is two-fold.

1. To develop the prize mentality and to reprogram themselves so that they’re no longer afflicted with the baggage that comes with so many years of being an AFC/beta. 

Dating multiple women is the coccon in which you metamorphize from beta to alpha- behold aloofness (who cares what one chick thinks/wants when you have others), confidence (I can always get another chick), and sexuality (you’re use to charming your way into a woman’s pants) all sprout from where before there was an asexual lump.

2. To realize what women are really like.

Its all too easy for a beta/AFC to get fooled into thinking that a woman/girl is worthy of your time, effort and life long committment when you do not know the true nature of women…. in short- ignorance is bliss.

Nascent alphas need the point driven home by seeing “nice girls” sucking them off in department stores, wifes and fiancees blantently cheating on their husbands, and women repeatidly lying and abusing the good nature of betas.

Both of the above will keep the nascent alpha on the road of caddishness and away from the pitfall of beta provider.

Set the rules, enforce the rules

A man needs to set the rules for a relationship.  Certain things are forbidden- end of discussion.

Women who engage in the said forbidden behaviors before their relationship with you will agree to your terms if they’re really interested in you- but you know as well as I that their whoe-ish hearts are not going to change overnight.

They will test your resolve at some point in the future- and if you’re a man you will have no choice but to call them out.  Most men will elect to dump them and walk away(which, even though you’re “gone”, will actually make you more attractive in her eyes).

I disagree with this tactic. You paint yourself into a corner by making the walking away mandatory. For rAFCs/nascent alphas this is good advice. They would stay in the relationship even though their dignity and self respect would be leaking like a sieve from them after they failed to follow through on their little rules ultimatum. They don’t have the emotional self-control and self-respect to do what I’m suggesting so its better that they walk away while they build up their experience, learn to control their emotions, and learn how to protect their hearts from the predations of manipulative and heartless women. (don’t think this is the case guys? Then why did she go out on Girls Night Out after you told her that her not going was so important to you?… exactly)

Walking away is intermediate game. You keep the prize mentality and your dignity and self respect by tossing a trashy girl in the garbage (as she deserves).

I think we can take it to the next level- the pimp level. what do pimps do- how do they achieve such control over women? They take a woman’s game a flip it on her- they employ the same strategies and tactics she uses, against AFCs, against her.

In America women operate out of the prize mentality and the master morality. They get men to buy them whatever they want- diamonds, dinner, whatever. They control the frame- they’re the little princess- and as royalty all their commands are to be fulfilled by the serfs in their domain (AFCs/betas). Now what do women do when they’re in the control frame and the serf defies her commands? Does she issue an ultimatum by threatening to walk away and following through if her demands are not met? No, of course not- she has invested time and energy into said AFC, he has her on a pedastool and she is firmly in control of his emotions (aka he LOOOOOOVES her).  Walking away is the A-bomb of her arsenal- she saves it for situations where her conventional weapons have proven completely insufficient (ie jerks/players). What are these conventional weapons that she usually employs? Positive and negative reinforcement of behaviors. Withdrawl of emotional intimacy, attention, sex, and use of jealousy as punishment. Return of the same as rewards (and then only via intermittent rewards).

When a man displeases her she acts cold when they speak to each other (emotional intimacy), she delays returning his calls and won’t set up “dates” with him (jealousy/attention),she’ll talk about/flirt with other guys (jealousy), she won’t sleep with him until he performs acts of contrition (buys jewelry, flowers, whatever) and only then when she feels like it (intermittant rewards/frame control).

Using said tactics a woman trains her beta/afc puppies the way she wants them- she has the dominence (given to her by her master morality) and frame control (given to her by her prize mentality); she is the Alpha, in the dog pack sense of the word, as a result. As the Alpha she decides what is acceptable and unacceptable and rewards/punishes in accordance with that. The reason she has the role is because the man defaulted and let her have it- since he wasn’t man enough to seize the dominance and frame control, and be the Alpha in the relationship, she defaulted into the role and seized it for herself.

As a man its our job to seize the dominance and frame control in relationships. We need to be the Alphas for women to respect us. If she has the prize mentality we need to see ourselves as more of a prize. If she operates from the master morality we need to seize the role and be the master of the master.

Only once we’ve done this and seized the role of leadership can we truly act like one. As the leader/Alpha in the relationship we decide what is appropriate/inappropriate for the relationship and reward/punish accordingly; it is our prerogative as the leader to do so.

Having rules is right- it sets you into the prize mentality and master morality.

Like a dog, a woman will test your resolve to see if you really have the testicles to maintain your role as alpha and remain master of the domain. If you fail she will attempt to seize the role for herself. When you set your rules she will undoubtedly and inevitably act in opposition in them to test your resolve and iron will.

With the walk away tactic, when she inevitably tests you, you lose. You’ve rigged the game against yourself and have painted yourself into a corner- when she tests you have no choice but to leave. You stay you lose your dignity and self respect (and her respect and submission), while if you leave you lose a lover.

No- just as you wouldn’t throw a dog out of the house for trying to sit on the couch you don’t dump a woman for shit testing you/testing your resolve (both are the same thing really). Rather- you change the nature of the game.

You punish and reward her with previously mentioned tactics for her lack of complience- and you make the litmus test for her commitment to you, and your role as dominant leader, by her submissiveness and compliance to whatever punishment you decide to meet out to her for defying you. Its only after she defies your role as leader, by defying your punishment, thereby showing she is not committed to you emotionally, that you dump her.

You make the compliance to the punishment the test, instead of the compliance to the rules.

Women will always test the rules to see if you’re a man. If you pass the tests and maintain your resolve then you will remain a man and her eyes and you will continue to have her respect, submissiveness, and compliance. Its only when you’ve failed enough tests, and she sees you as a beta, that she will flaunt the rules and defy the punishment.