Your home effects your mental state

“State”, is, for lack of a better way of putting it, your underyling  subconscious comfort level; It’s not an emotion, its how relaxed or stressed the brain feels which in turn influcences your emotions and disposition.  When your state is positive you’re more emotionally dynamic- you’re more able to easily resonate with people emotionally, you’re more talkitive, optimistic, and extroverted.   

In someplace unfamiliar, dirty, or chaotic?  Then you feel uncomfortable and stressed- even though you’re not feeling an emotion such as anger, love, or happiness per say.  Similarly, if you’re in a place that’s familiar, clean, and organized you’re going to feel less stressed and more relaxed even though, once again, you’re not expirencing any particular emotion. 

People recommend everything from jerking off, to watching Seinfeld, to not jerking off in order to have a better state.   They’re trying to achieve that higher subconscious baseline from which to operate before they go out and try to pickup girls; they know that their chances of success are that much higher with a positive state, they’ll seem more attractive and vibe better once they start interacting.

You have limited control of your environment once you step out your door; but you do control inside your door. 

An organized and clean living space has a strong positive effect on your state.   Whether getting up in the morning, or stepping out the door, your brain responds to the cleanliness and organization of a well maintained home.  Somehow having everything in its place and maintained makes your subconscious feel less cluttered, disorganized, and chaotic.  Your state is automatically improved as are your interactions with others.


Exploiting Violence Proxies

If you observe male animals in the wild you’ll see that they fight for mating rights to females. 

Bull Moose, Rams, Lions, Chimps… all are asserting their superiority and breeding rights over females.The clash of horns, the roars, the chest pounding- all of it is to see which is the superior male that deserves to mate.  The order of operations of this behavior is usually as follow:

A challenge is issued. The two males try to intimidate each other- if one doesen’t back off they will fight for supremacy.  In the state of nature strength, status, and willpower determine the order of the mating heirarchy. 

Basically speaking there are two methods of resolving a question of superiority between two males

1. Resolution via intimidation

2. Resolution via violence

Humans have the same behavioral substructure built within their hindbrain. 

  In human beings, the challenge is public insults.  A failure to respond to an insult is a failure to rise to a challenge- it’s surrender in the male mating dance before the fight has even begun.  A failure to respond to an insult is a direct blow to ranking within the status heirarchy and consequently a decrease in social power and mating opportunities.  

That is why males react and have a very visceral emotional reaction to insults.  Its why ghetto thugs will kill each other over “disrespect” and why fights start in bars.  The men “know” that failure to respond, either with a chest pounding of their own or with violence, will result in the surrounding women seeing them as weak and inferior- and consequently mating with their rivals.

Human soceity has thrown a wrench in the gears of this little mechanism- namely retaliatory violence proxies.  These proxies (Police, Bouncers, etc) both intimidate and brutally repress the “resolution via violence” system of the alpha male social heirarchy.

“Assholes” exploit this in social situations.  They know that they’re protected by these violence proxies-  they’re free from having to back up their heirarchal challenges with the promise of “resolution via violence” if the challenge is answered and the “resolution via intimidation” fails;  so they insult/degrade the males around them with impunity.  Most males are too “polite” to respond with a chest pounding verbal volley of their own back at the asshole, and fear to respond with violence because of the violence proxies- so they, in the eyes of women, appear weak;  too afraid to rise to the verbal challenge of the Asshole male. 

 The Asshole wins the heirarchal challenge and gets laid by the surrounding women as a result.

Good Girls

So many men think they have good girls… why?

They give many reasons- but they can be summed up as because their girls told them they were.

Women are deceiptful, self cenetered, selfish, manipulative, and trecherous. Don’t trust a word that comes out of their mouth when they talk about their sexual history. When they tell you their “sexual history” you’re not reading the book of their life- you’re reading a propaganda phamphlet designed to ensare you and reel you into the cause.

Want to know what the real history is? Get the chick REALLY drunk. Play it cool; don’t be judgemental- play the role and listen. You’ll find out the sort of wretched prostitute you’re idealizing and putting on a pedastol.


Your rose colored fairtale version of reality, aka The Matrix, may not survive when you learn that a girl who LOOKS pretty and acts innocent is, most likely, a filthy whore.

Why nascent alphas need to date multiple women

The point of dating multiple women, for the guys who are not yet true alphas, is two-fold.

1. To develop the prize mentality and to reprogram themselves so that they’re no longer afflicted with the baggage that comes with so many years of being an AFC/beta. 

Dating multiple women is the coccon in which you metamorphize from beta to alpha- behold aloofness (who cares what one chick thinks/wants when you have others), confidence (I can always get another chick), and sexuality (you’re use to charming your way into a woman’s pants) all sprout from where before there was an asexual lump.

2. To realize what women are really like.

Its all too easy for a beta/AFC to get fooled into thinking that a woman/girl is worthy of your time, effort and life long committment when you do not know the true nature of women…. in short- ignorance is bliss.

Nascent alphas need the point driven home by seeing “nice girls” sucking them off in department stores, wifes and fiancees blantently cheating on their husbands, and women repeatidly lying and abusing the good nature of betas.

Both of the above will keep the nascent alpha on the road of caddishness and away from the pitfall of beta provider.

Set the rules, enforce the rules

A man needs to set the rules for a relationship.  Certain things are forbidden- end of discussion.

Women who engage in the said forbidden behaviors before their relationship with you will agree to your terms if they’re really interested in you- but you know as well as I that their whoe-ish hearts are not going to change overnight.

They will test your resolve at some point in the future- and if you’re a man you will have no choice but to call them out.  Most men will elect to dump them and walk away(which, even though you’re “gone”, will actually make you more attractive in her eyes).

I disagree with this tactic. You paint yourself into a corner by making the walking away mandatory. For rAFCs/nascent alphas this is good advice. They would stay in the relationship even though their dignity and self respect would be leaking like a sieve from them after they failed to follow through on their little rules ultimatum. They don’t have the emotional self-control and self-respect to do what I’m suggesting so its better that they walk away while they build up their experience, learn to control their emotions, and learn how to protect their hearts from the predations of manipulative and heartless women. (don’t think this is the case guys? Then why did she go out on Girls Night Out after you told her that her not going was so important to you?… exactly)

Walking away is intermediate game. You keep the prize mentality and your dignity and self respect by tossing a trashy girl in the garbage (as she deserves).

I think we can take it to the next level- the pimp level. what do pimps do- how do they achieve such control over women? They take a woman’s game a flip it on her- they employ the same strategies and tactics she uses, against AFCs, against her.

In America women operate out of the prize mentality and the master morality. They get men to buy them whatever they want- diamonds, dinner, whatever. They control the frame- they’re the little princess- and as royalty all their commands are to be fulfilled by the serfs in their domain (AFCs/betas). Now what do women do when they’re in the control frame and the serf defies her commands? Does she issue an ultimatum by threatening to walk away and following through if her demands are not met? No, of course not- she has invested time and energy into said AFC, he has her on a pedastool and she is firmly in control of his emotions (aka he LOOOOOOVES her).  Walking away is the A-bomb of her arsenal- she saves it for situations where her conventional weapons have proven completely insufficient (ie jerks/players). What are these conventional weapons that she usually employs? Positive and negative reinforcement of behaviors. Withdrawl of emotional intimacy, attention, sex, and use of jealousy as punishment. Return of the same as rewards (and then only via intermittent rewards).

When a man displeases her she acts cold when they speak to each other (emotional intimacy), she delays returning his calls and won’t set up “dates” with him (jealousy/attention),she’ll talk about/flirt with other guys (jealousy), she won’t sleep with him until he performs acts of contrition (buys jewelry, flowers, whatever) and only then when she feels like it (intermittant rewards/frame control).

Using said tactics a woman trains her beta/afc puppies the way she wants them- she has the dominence (given to her by her master morality) and frame control (given to her by her prize mentality); she is the Alpha, in the dog pack sense of the word, as a result. As the Alpha she decides what is acceptable and unacceptable and rewards/punishes in accordance with that. The reason she has the role is because the man defaulted and let her have it- since he wasn’t man enough to seize the dominance and frame control, and be the Alpha in the relationship, she defaulted into the role and seized it for herself.

As a man its our job to seize the dominance and frame control in relationships. We need to be the Alphas for women to respect us. If she has the prize mentality we need to see ourselves as more of a prize. If she operates from the master morality we need to seize the role and be the master of the master.

Only once we’ve done this and seized the role of leadership can we truly act like one. As the leader/Alpha in the relationship we decide what is appropriate/inappropriate for the relationship and reward/punish accordingly; it is our prerogative as the leader to do so.

Having rules is right- it sets you into the prize mentality and master morality.

Like a dog, a woman will test your resolve to see if you really have the testicles to maintain your role as alpha and remain master of the domain. If you fail she will attempt to seize the role for herself. When you set your rules she will undoubtedly and inevitably act in opposition in them to test your resolve and iron will.

With the walk away tactic, when she inevitably tests you, you lose. You’ve rigged the game against yourself and have painted yourself into a corner- when she tests you have no choice but to leave. You stay you lose your dignity and self respect (and her respect and submission), while if you leave you lose a lover.

No- just as you wouldn’t throw a dog out of the house for trying to sit on the couch you don’t dump a woman for shit testing you/testing your resolve (both are the same thing really). Rather- you change the nature of the game.

You punish and reward her with previously mentioned tactics for her lack of complience- and you make the litmus test for her commitment to you, and your role as dominant leader, by her submissiveness and compliance to whatever punishment you decide to meet out to her for defying you. Its only after she defies your role as leader, by defying your punishment, thereby showing she is not committed to you emotionally, that you dump her.

You make the compliance to the punishment the test, instead of the compliance to the rules.

Women will always test the rules to see if you’re a man. If you pass the tests and maintain your resolve then you will remain a man and her eyes and you will continue to have her respect, submissiveness, and compliance. Its only when you’ve failed enough tests, and she sees you as a beta, that she will flaunt the rules and defy the punishment.


Sociopaths/bpd act from the master morality. They lie, manipulate, and do whatever is in their interest without regard for the emotions of those around them.

Sound familar?
I repeat- they do what is in THEIR best interest without regards for the emotions of those around them.

Unless you’re foolishly naive or shelter, you’ll realize that this describes women, particularly American women, perfectly.

The advocates of morality would have us sacrificing ourselves for these creatures, but is not the corellary to the Golden rule to treat others how they treat you?  Should we not be giving onto them what they give onto us and emulate their behavior?

I say yes.  Women act in their own best interest- they lie, cheat, steal, and manipulate heartlessly and do so following their emotional whims- its second nature to them.  Its no more wrong to lie to a woman then it is to steal from a thief.

They have no ethics to speak of- they are completely amoral. I say that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander- we have every right to do the same to get OUR NEEDS met. On an ethical level any objections from them are pure hypocracy. That only leaves the fact that they might feel “hurt” by what we do- but since they don’t care in the slightest about our emotions so why should we care about theirs?

We shouldn’t.


By doing so with women, you’re acting as an agent of Karma and giving them exactly what they deserve.